Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: 6x139.7 4Runner/Tacoma Swaps

  1. #1
    Forum Newbie
    My Van(s):
    1987 TVan 5spd 4x4 Cargo
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    7
    Rep Power
    0

    6x139.7 4Runner/Tacoma Swaps

    Hi team
    Thanks for the add - been messing around with RHDs for years and ended up with a new (to me) 1987 4x4 5spd Cargo recently
    Quickly noticing 5x139.7 is basically being removed from the planet
    Brakes, wheels, diffs, etc - all becoming rare unobtainium

    Has anyone swapped a 4x4 van with 6x139.7 parts?
    Basically the rear axle and spindles from a 4runner/tacoma

    Biggest hang up is the front 4x4 - most likely the Van control arms aren't compatible with 6x139.7 and nothing will bolt up

    Curious what others have thought around this impending doom

    There are bits and pieces of swap info adding 4Runner parts to Van, but I'd like to do away with all the discontinued parts, weird wheels and etc in one go
    https://www.toyotavantech.com/forum/...t=4runner+swap
    https://www.toyotavantech.com/forum/...ht=TACOMA+SWAP

    Thanks again!

  2. #2
    Van Obsessed
    My Van(s):
    1988 4WD LE auto dual range t-case (the mistress) 1988 4WD LE auto(the donut van)
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Tacoma, Wa
    Posts
    790
    Rep Power
    1

    Re: 6x139.7 4Runner/Tacoma Swaps

    4runner/truck rear axles are wider by a few inches necessitating customization to fit as well as wheels needing a front wheel drive offset again requiring custom wheels which is why there is virtually no aftermarket wheels and really never has been. The front may be adaptable to the 4runner/truck wheel hubs. I have done some research on this for a full float rear conversion like what is available from Front Range Off-road for the truck/4runner so I can add locking hubs to the rear and flat tow my van behind an RV and found bearing id's to be the same with the outer bearing calling for the same part # but have never checked spindle length/inner outer bearing separation distance to confirm. Even then you would have to look at brake disc offset and compatability with caliper mounting on the van spindles. All things pointed to a lot of custom work and I haven't pursued it further.

  3. #3
    Forum Newbie
    My Van(s):
    1987 TVan 5spd 4x4 Cargo
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Vancouver BC
    Posts
    7
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 6x139.7 4Runner/Tacoma Swaps

    Interesting stuff - hard to find specs on these. Lots of 4runner/tacoma info around
    Perhaps really you would need to go to RAV4 parts and 5x114.3 to stay Toyota, albeit that is all lighter-duty...really are unique vans

    From what I can see even a Rav4 is too wide - also an AWD platform so no manual hubs...bolt pattern is too small anyways
    Just comparing track widths
    57.9 in for 1999 - https://www.cars.com/research/toyota-rav4-1999/specs/
    59.1 in for 2005 - https://www.cars.com/research/toyota-rav4-2005/specs/

    vs the 54.5 inch Vanwagon -
    https://toyota.drive.place/lang/la/m...minivan/295093
    https://wikicar.org/brand-models/toy...0surf/1982/Van

    Seemingly not much around that fit's the bill at all
    Only early 4runner/pickups have similar axle widths, but parts are scarce there too

    From what I can see the Toyota Van is a JDM MasterAce
    In the Toyota family, the bolt pattern originates with the Daihatsu Rugger, also badged as the Toyota Blizzard which was a direct competitor to the Suzuki Jimny/Samurai
    The MasterAce/Townace truck is the result of combining the Rugger platform with the LiteAce platform
    Rugger/Blizzard and Townace production stopped 1999, marking Toyotas end of using 5x139.7

    Makes sense that here in North America, the Suzuki and Vanwagons match bolt pattern, but for reasons we wouldn't know


    cheers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •